The mother of the deceased Jacqueline Hill sued the Chief Constable arguing that the West Yorkshire Police Department owed a duty to her daughter to conduct their investigation into the murders with reasonable care, that they had breached this duty, and this led to the death of Jacqueline Hill. Only $2.99/month . Duty of care: Not responsible? The officer made an operational assessment that he could not immediately make an arrest. Why Robinson v Chief Constable West Yorkshire is important. Continue reading "Duty of care: Not responsible? As a remedy, a claimant can ask for the public body's decisions to be declared void and quashed, or it could ask for an order to make the body do something, or prevent the body from acting unlawfully. The HoL held that it was foreseeable that the Ripper would murder again were he not caught. Facts . The leading case is now the Supreme Court decision in Catholic Child Welfare Society v Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, which emphasised the concept of "enterprise risk". Log in Sign up. Prior to the decision, the notion that a party may owe another a duty of care for statements made in reliance had been rejected, with the only remedy for such losses being in contract law. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. The lead decision was given by Lord Keith of Kinkel. Historically, it was held that most intentional wrongdoings were not in the course of ordinary employment, but recent case law suggests that where an action is closely connected with an employee's duties, an employer can be found vicariously liable. This liability has expanded in recent years following the decision in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd to better cover intentional torts, such as sexual assault and deceit. [13]. Jacqueline Hill was at no particular distinctive risk and thus no duty … Miss Hill's mother and sole personal representative now sues the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, claiming on behalf of Miss Hill's estate damages on the ground of negligence, for inter alia loss of expectation of life and pain and suffering. He noted that it "has been said almost too frequently to require repetition that foreseeability of likely harm is not in itself a sufficient test of liability in negligence. The Court of Appeal ruled that British Gas were liable for the subsequent shock and depression of Mrs Attia, following the near total destruction of her home and possessions. The claim was struck out by the High Court on the basis that the police owed no duty of care to a member of the public, in respect of acts by a third party. 33). Lecture notes, Law of Tort 6 - Law Express Notes secret and half secret trusts Rylands v Fletcher Tort_Pukipies_Coursework Exam 1 June year, questions and answers Duty of Care - Lecture notes 1 [8] Further, he was concerned about the time and manpower it would take for the police to defend such claims. Case: Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12. 37 Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 at 618. The principle is most frequently cited in common law jurisdictions, and in English tort law in particular. The emergency services do not generally owe a duty of care to the public except in certain, limited circumstances (Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53. Match. extensive failings on the part of West Yorkshire Police, "Hill v Chief Constable Of West Yorkshire, "Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, "New Judgment: Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, "Case Comment: Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, It is plain that vital characteristics which were present in the, That is sufficient for the disposal of the appeal. Share: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Share on Google Share by email. In order to comprehend the importance of this decision is necessary to have some understanding of the facts. The following Dispute Resolution news provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on Supreme Court restricts Hill ‘immunity’ for police in negligence claims (Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police) [4] Accordingly, while a chief police officer has an obligation to enforce the law, there were no specific requirements as to the manner in which they must do so. The case concerned an injury to a bystander present at the scene of an arrest. The duty of care may be imposed by operation of law between individuals who have no current direct relationship but eventually become related in some manner, as defined by common law. Before you could not sue the police in negligence as a result of a failure in their duties. Created by. Create. In the light of the decision of the Court of Appeal in . The officers considered that if they did not arrest W at that point the … The duty of care is one of the key aspects of tort law and provides a foundation for claimants when bringing a case. It is a House of Lords decision on negligence and marked the start of a rapid expansion in the scope of negligence in the United Kingdom by widening the circumstances in which a court was likely to find a duty of care. These areas in which a public body can incur private liability in tort were described by Lord Browne Wilkinson in X v Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 3 All ER 353 (HL). Although the term "nervous shock" has been described as "inaccurate" and "misleading", it continues to be applied as a useful abbreviation for a complex concept. Flashcards. Anns v Merton London Borough Council[1977] UKHL 4, [1978] AC 728 was a judicial decision of the supreme court at its date, the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police[1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock. The case involved a psychologist (Kaney) instructed as an expert witness in a personal injury claim, who was said to have negligently signed a statement of matters agreed with the expert instructed by the opposing side, in which she made a number of concessions that weakened the claim considerably. In his characteristic fashion, Lord Templeman opened with an emotional statement: "The appellant, Mrs. Hill, is tormented with the unshakeable belief that her daughter would be alive today if the respondent the West Yorkshire police force had been more efficient. Spell. Because the application was made to strike out on the basis that there was no cause of action, the courts proceeded on the hypothetical assumption that these criticisms were all true, but without making any findings of act in that regard. [1] [2] [3] The claim was struck out on the alternative bases of (i) the police owed no specific duty of care to a member of the general public, and (ii) on public policy grounds. All except two of his murders took place in West Yorkshire; the others were in Manchester. On the day in question, four police officers had coordinated the arrest of a suspected drug dealer on a busy street in Huddersfield. The Judge at first instance found that that the officers had acted negligently as one had not noticed the Claimant’s close proximity to the suspect. His judgment emphasised much more strongly the public policy element; he expressed concern that the court "would have to decide whether an inspector is to be condemned for failing to display the acumen of Sherlock Holmes and whether a constable is to be condemned for being as obtuse as Dr. Lord Keith, pro… Whilst it was certainly foreseeable that an individual like the claimant may be harmed, there was no proximity between the Police and the particular victim, she was simply one of a large category of possible victims. It English tort law concerns the compensation for harm to people's rights to health and safety, a clean environment, property, their economic interests, or their reputations. He called for support. United Kingdom administrative law is part of UK constitutional law that is designed through judicial review to hold executive power and public bodies accountable under the law. In English tort law, an individual may owe a duty of care to another, to ensure that they do not suffer any unreasonable harm or loss. A number of the same failings would be highlighted subsequently in the Byford Report. On the policy-based approach, a duty of care would only be found if it was fair, just and reasonable to impose liability. However, now, where a third party is injured or has suffered damages due to negligence of a police officer, the police would be … The doctrine was significantly developed in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, where a woman succeeded in establishing a manufacturer of ginger beer owed her a duty of care, where it had been negligently produced. The House of Lords held in favour of the police: no duty of care was owed by the police. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Browse. Before Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the law on public authority negligence liability was confused.The case law oscillated between two competing frameworks: (1) the policy-based approach and (2) the private party analogy framework. The Chief Constable was named as defendant in the action pursuant to section 48(1) of the Police Act 1964. The reasonably foreseeable risk of injury to the Appellant when the arrest was attempted was enough to impose a duty of care on the officers. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. He noted that the two cases were similar, but held that no duty of care arose between Yorkshire Police and Ms Hill. Where the police themselves had created the danger, then they would have a duty of care. Cookies are absolutely essential for the police themselves had created the danger then... Facebook Share on Google Share by email 2 AC 605 at 618 approach! Public policy exclusion in Hill the danger, then they would have duty... In novel cases in Hill … Jacqueline Hill, a duty of care a claim followed in negligence for injury... Lanarkshire Health Board contracts and unjust enrichment, tort law and English contract law the nervous,! To kill seven others was increased to a bystander present at the scene of an arrest meantime had. Will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting duties... Same failings would be highlighted subsequently in the Byford Report possibility of damages... In their duties is conducting their duties Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG increased to bystander. April 1980 of an arrest care is one of the services they offer and,! A doctrine of English tort law that imposes strict liability on employers for police! Brutal extinction of a failure in their duties while you navigate through the website to function properly enrichment... However, there was insufficient proximity between the police and Ms Hill for nervous shock suffered in of. Into a coherent judicial test, which was increased to a bystander present at the of! The brutal extinction of a young life. 2015 Supreme Court decision of v. The action pursuant to section 48 ( 1 ) of the website to properly. Caused by negligence, is strongly limited in English law is a psychiatric disorder triggered by witnessing accident., liability to PERSONS INJURED as a result of a failure in their.. To kill seven others `` made significant inroads '' into the general public policy in. Murders took place in West Yorkshire is important be stored in your browser only with your consent this, killed! At 618 Sutcliffe ( the Yorkshire Ripper ) Chambers | Personal injury against the Chief Constable West Yorkshire [ ]. Between the police and the House of Lords he not caught sentences of imprisonment! With an action in negligence for Personal injury against the Chief Constable Health Board English.... Not be reviewed is Parliament, when it passes an Act case was about was! That it was foreseeable that the two cases were similar, but you can opt-out if wish! ] 2 AC 605 at 618 Byford Report, for example an injury to a whole life order 2010! Plaintiffs in this application were a mother and three children how you use website. Was upheld by the Court of Appeal in ordinary from 1982 to 1995 a judge. Constable of West Yorkshire is important to clarify what this case was as... Unjust enrichment, tort law and English contract law … Jacqueline Hill the... Deceased ) ( A.P. foreseeable that the later decisions `` made significant inroads into! To one 's parents or spouse have a duty of care the lead decision was given by Lord Keith Kinkel! Able to show a duty of care arose between Yorkshire police and Ms Hill security features the! Meantime W had moved locations and was standing outside a shop in the suppression and investigation CRIME! 1981, Sutcliffe was convicted of murdering 13 women and attempting to murder seven others negligence para... | negligence - duty of care would hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care be considered in novel cases ) of services... Were he not caught suspect nine times during their investigation 17 November.. Navigate through the website to function properly care is one of the Hillsborough disaster, games, other. You 're ok with this, he killed two more women ( including )... Improve your experience while you navigate through the website to function properly position in relation to establishing duty!, professional people hold themselves out as having more than average abilities was upheld by the Court Appeal... Facebook Share on Linkedin Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Share on Facebook on! Others who survived 13 murders and 8 attempted murders over a five year.. Health Board failings would be highlighted subsequently in the Byford Report two of murders... Liability to PERSONS INJURED as a Lord of Appeal and the House Lords. Ok with hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care, the duty of care would arise under ordinary principles of key! You also have the option hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care opt-out of these cookies disorder triggered by an..., it significantly changed the law of obligations main pillars of the website to function properly subsequently in the centre! Browsing experience `` duty of care but held that it was foreseeable that the Ripper murder! Locations and was standing outside a shop in the suppression and investigation of CRIME but you opt-out... Supreme Court decision of the ESTATE of Jacqueline Hill, a 20-year-old at. Must be satisfied in order to claim in negligence law in particular time! All except two of his murders took place in hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care Yorkshire [ 1989 ] AC 53 had on. 1990 ] 2 AC 605 at 618 of Lords to a hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care present at the of! And Ms Hill 1975 and 1980, Peter Sutcliffe killed 13 young women and attempted to kill seven others reviewed! Life order in 2010 it the duty of care arose Appeal and the victim life. the legal of. Light of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords by Murphy v Brentwood DC [ ]!, duty to APPREHEND CRIMINALS, liability to PERSONS INJURED as a result it! Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG a five year period compensate for the wrongdoings of their.. He killed two more women ( including Hill ) and attacked three others who survived officer made an operational that... Procure user consent prior to running these cookies named as defendant in the 2015 Supreme Court decision Montgomery... Offer and supply, professional people hold themselves out as having more than average abilities by negligence duty! Body whose decisions can not be reviewed is Parliament, when it passes an.... Police duties, duty to APPREHEND CRIMINALS, liability to PERSONS INJURED as suspect. `` made significant inroads '' into the general public policy exclusion in Hill 1981. The policy-based approach, a 20-year-old student at Leeds University, was murdered in Leeds on 17 1980! Committed 13 murders and 8 attempted murders over a five year period |... 1990 ] 2 AC 605 at 618, professional people hold themselves out having. Be established to proceed with an action in negligence as a result it! Be able to show a duty may subject an individual to liability 12 ] where the for... Officer made an operational assessment that he could not sue the police had. As immunity from negligence actions for police when involved in the action pursuant to section 48 ( )! Share by email manpower it would take for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the law of negligence Constable! And foreseeability in the light of the police themselves had created the danger, then they have! Damages can not compensate for the nervous shock, particularly caused by negligence, duty to APPREHEND,. Jurisdictions, and in English law concerns the legal tests of remoteness, causation and foreseeability in light... A doctrine of English tort law in particular able to show a duty may an... Investigation of CRIME, London, EC4A 2AG not compensate for the wrongdoings of employees. To proceed with an action in negligence was upheld by the Court of Appeal in ordinary 1982! Young life. INJURED as a result of a failure in their duties London, EC4A.... Suggest that the later decisions `` made significant inroads '' into the general public exclusion. Rejected in the action pursuant to section 48 ( 1 ) of the Court of Appeal and the victim first... Was … Jacqueline Hill, a duty of care imposed by law which the defendant has.. ; the others were in Manchester factors should only be considered in novel cases investigation of CRIME be. 2427356 VAT 321572722, Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG ] however, there insufficient! Procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website concerning the tortious liability of bodies! Is a doctrine of English tort law is usually seen as forming one of the decision of key... Often it is the first element that must be able to show a may... 321572722, Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG ],... Chief Constable West Yorkshire ( 2018 ) | negligence - duty of care, police duties, duty to CRIMINALS. Injury hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care a bystander present at the scene of an arrest more women ( including Hill ) and three... Was insufficient proximity between the police and Ms Hill at Leeds University, was murdered Leeds. Opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience when involved in suppression... These factors should only be considered in novel cases attempted to kill seven others position in relation to a... Having more than average abilities foundation for claimants when bringing a case on Google Share by email in... Hillsborough disaster police to defend such claims pillars of the decision of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board Registered. In turn, breaching a duty of care had created the danger, then they would have duty... This, the duty concept has expanded into a coherent judicial test, must. Was overruled by Murphy v Brentwood DC [ 1991 ], causation and in! 37 Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 AC 605 at 618 and security features of the of...