The dispute between the airline and unions was around wages paid in arrears. Qantas has repeatedly denied any deliberate wrongdoing and publicly explained how it has used taxpayer money. A baggage handler earns $1,500 in wages and $1,500 in overtime in one fortnight before being stood down in the next one. In a recent decision of Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia (the JobKeeper Case) the Federal Court of Australia considered and determined the correct application of the JobKeeper provisions contained in section 789GDA(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009.. Rather than receive $3,000 in the first fortnight and be paid $1,500 in the next, courtesy of JobKeeper, they would be paid $1,500 in both. The airline says this is part of a drive to recover from the Covid-19 crisis. The jurisdictional issues concern whether the dispute is a JobKeeper dispute … The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute … In 2018, the company offloaded its subsidiaries Snap Fresh and Q Catering, which had a 1,200 in-house workforce, to the Emirates Group’s dnata catering, cargo and ground handling entity. In other words, Qantas came out $1,500 in front and the worker $1,500 behind. Today’s judgement appears to cut across that principle,” a company spokesperson said. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) disputes that […] The dispute between the airline and unions was around wages paid in arrears. That ‘safety net’ assurance is a central part of the Government’s JobKeeper policy. The affected airports include Australia’s busiest—Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide—as well as terminals in larger regional centres such as Canberra, Darwin, Cairns and Alice Springs. It is a corporate handout aimed at propping up big business, attacking the wages and conditions of workers, and disguising the devastating unemployment crisis confronting the working class. Qantas argued that determining the dispute was beyond the jurisdiction of the FWC, and the Federal Court agreed. This application to deal with a dispute in relation to JobKeeper concerned what the applicant considered to be an incorrect application of the JobKeeper payment rules, and how they applied to monthly paid but stood down employees. The Commission cannot generally assist with underpayment claims and this would include payments under the JobKeeper scheme, however, a matter has already been appealed to a Full Bench in which Qantas is challenging whether the FWC has jurisdiction to deal with an employee’s dispute … While Qantas maintains this squared with a long-held enterprise agreement, Justice Geoffrey Flick ruled on Thursday that it was inconsistent with way JobKeeper was to be administered. This application to deal with a dispute in relation to JobKeeper concerned what the applicant considered to be an incorrect application of the JobKeeper payment rules, and how they applied to monthly paid but stood down employees. The dispute specifically effected how Qantas calculated “amounts payable” in a fortnight to employees receiving JobKeeper, but Justice Flick noted its resolution “affects not only the parties to the present dispute but has potential application for all employers and employees participating in the JobKeeper Scheme”. Dubbed the "Qantas JobKeeper Case" this case is of particular relevance to employers who pay employees for overtime in arrears. Qantas argued that determining the dispute was beyond the jurisdiction of the FWC, and the Federal Court agreed. Qantas has accused the TWU of not telling the truth in response to the union filing a landmark ‘test case’ against the airline in court. Essentially, it was a question about what constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules. It issued an injunction restraining the FWC from dealing with the matter, and the Court will deal with the matters to finality itself. This assault on the Qantas workforce was opened by Joyce’s grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011 during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. This resulted in a loss of workers’ conditions including a superannuation benefits scheme. The Transport Workers’ Union is today lodging an urgent dispute in the Fair Work Commission over Qantas’ intent to rush through a redundancy process starting just two days before Christmas. The dispute specifically effected how Qantas calculated “amounts payable” in a fortnight to employees receiving JobKeeper, but Justice Flick noted its resolution “affects not only the parties to the present dispute but has potential application for all employers and employees participating in the JobKeeper Scheme”. Essentially, it was a question about what constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules. Stay tuned for updates. Mazzitelli v Qantas Airways Limited Background. Legal experts and unions have drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing and the 1998 Waterfront Dispute. “Qantas has based all of its decisions on JobKeeper on the legislation and guidance provided by the ATO and made sure all employees receive a ‘safety net’ payment of $1500 per fortnight. The disputed Qantas plans would see the airline brand remove operations at the 10 Australian airports where the work is done in-house, which … While orders have not yet been finalised, Flick said that if the ruling meant that Qantas workers would have to backpay workers, “so be it”. “Qantas management has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving $800 million in public funding. Qantas and Jetstar workers have been missing out on these entitlements, as penalty rates and shift loadings have been shunted into payment periods of stand-down, meaning they are absorbed into the JobKeeper payment rather than being paid on top. Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, whereas unions argued staff should be receiving both the wage owed and the government subsidy. The Federal Court has found Qantas did not reasonably apply its JobKeeper subsidies and now owes back payment to hundreds of staff members who were engaged throughout the pandemic. It issued an injunction restraining the FWC from dealing with the matter, and the Court will deal with the matters to finality itself. Qantas (QF, Sydney Kingsford Smith) has announced the outsourcing of 2,000 ground staff jobs at ten airports across Australia in a move to cut costs as it faces a financial hit from the global COVID-19 pandemic.. A dispute arose in relation to the interpretation of section 789GDA in circumstances where work performed by an employee in a fortnight was paid across two JobKeeper fortnights. Qantas loses bid to make use of jobkeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion of wages invoice | Enterprise. Moreover, when Joyce announced the 6,000 job cuts in June he admitted that the carrier had $5 billion in capital. Various unions have gone to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) challenging Qantas’ interpretation of the JobKeeper rules, which can exclude stood down workers from receiving overtime payments they are owed. ( AP: Rick Rycroft ) It's a parallel the TWU is only too keen to draw. 26th Aug: Federal Court hearing for the above mentioned JobKeeper dispute. The dispute between the airline and unions was around wages paid in arrears. Qantas argued the JobKeeper rules (namely rule 10(s3)) permitted payments for monthly paid employees to be applied across two fortnights in a ‘reasonable manner’. It has taken that money and abused our systems, ripping workers off and planning to outsource workers whose jobs the airline admits are needed.”. Qantas has received over $800 million taxpayers’ funding, including from Jobkeeper and other financial assistance. Qantas Group's approach to use JobKeeper payments to cover owed penalty rates. The Federal Court has ruled against the Australian airline in a landmark decision, finding its interpretation of the JobKeeper subsidy deprived workers of overtime. Section 789GDA(2)(b) contains the “minimum payment guarantee”, … The airline unions then agreed to enforce the company’s demands during closed-door arbitrated negotiations overseen by the Labor government’s Fair Work industrial tribunal. Mazzitelli v Qantas Airways Limited Background. Excluding such one-off costs, Qantas remained in the black with a reported profit of $124 million. The workers were stood down in March and have been unable to access sick, carers and compassionate leave. The TWU has said Qantas’ bidding process for its ground handling contract was a sham, after it picked Swissport’s proposal ahead of its own in-house rival.. It’s simply the latest war of words between the unions and the airline, both of whom have been locked in a tense struggle over not only this pay dispute but also Qantas’ plan to cut 2,500 ground staff jobs. The Federal Court ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the JobKeeper wage subsidy program on Thursday. Qantas revealed it has its 'own dispute' with the Western Australia airport over what it called 'excessive charges', for which it has spent a year in court. Qantas is in the federal court on Wednesday seeking clarification over how it has been paying workers. In About-Face, UK Will Not Allow Huawei To Be Involved In Any Part Of... Universal Orlando Parks Will Reopen June 5 Despite Risk Of... Pro-Privacy Lawmakers Secure A Vote To Protect Browsing Data From... Jurassic World: Dominion Is Definitely Not The Planned End Of The... White Twitch Talk Show Host Finally Drops 'Rajj Patel' Moniker, Everything We Know About The PlayStation 5. FWC can rule on a JobKeeper dispute; Finally, Qantas had a loss this week (on the heels of its two wins). “We have always made JobKeeper payments to our employees … “Qantas has based all of its decisions on JobKeeper on the legislation and guidance provided by the ATO and made sure all employees receive a ‘safety net’ payment of $1,500 per fortnight. They lost this argument initially and then on appeal (which also involved the ACTU). More than 9,000 small businesses have objected to the Australian Taxation Office's (ATOs) decisions to deny them coronavirus stimulus payments including JobKeeper and … I moved to the US from China — here are the biggest cultural differences I've noticed between the 2 countries, Bath & Body Works is now a standalone company — we visited a store and saw why it's been L Brands' secret weapon, CBA and NAB pass on RBA interest rate cut in full, but ANZ and Westpac defy Treasurer Josh Frydenberg's orders, How to watch Netflix on your TV in 5 different ways, The incredible story of Ferrari's 72-year journey from an upstart racing team to a $27 billion luxury brand. On 15 April Qantas paid the employee $2,352.30 gross for work performed up to 6 April and then a further $647.70 gross by way of JobKeeper “top up”. Jobkeeper disputesby Practical Law EmploymentRelated ContentThis case tracker outlines key decisions of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) where an application has been made under section 789GV of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) for the FWC to deal with a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of the FW Act.Upgrade Your subscription doesn't currently include access to this resource. The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute … The case concerns the application of the JobKeeper payment rules to an employee who was stood down under general stand down provisions in the Fair Work Act. Qantas told Business Insider Australia that the airline is “carefully considering” whether it will appeal the judgement, and that “it is misleading of unions to suggest employees should expect a sudden windfall”. A stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments. For all this feigned sympathy, workers’ lives are being ripped apart to maintain shareholder values and fund exorbitant executive remuneration packages. Online JobKeeper disputes bench book. Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) president Michele O’Neil pleaded with the Liberal-National government to “act immediately to put in place an aviation industry support plan.”. A copy of the case Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants' Association of Australia (the "Qantas JobKeeper Case") FCA 1365 is available here. The Dispute. Backed by one government after another, Qantas has been eliminating jobs, including by out-sourcing, for years. JobKeeper test case: Qantas Airways Limited v Mathew Mazzitelli . Qantas’s outsourcing of ground operations came after CEO Joyce claimed the airline had registered a net financial year after-tax loss of $1.9 billion. In what I believe to be the first JobKeeper dispute dealt with by the Fair Work Commission, a Qantas employee has contested the right of Qantas to calculate the JobKeeper subsidy (which it called a “top-up”) payable to an employee stood down in April in any other manner than as tranches of fortnightly entitlements, even though the employee was paid monthly. Previous Qantas restructurings included the destruction of 5,000 full-time jobs, the imposition of an 18-month wage freeze and the slashing of working conditions. A stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments. Qantas will outsource some 2,050 jobs, while its low-cost carrier Jetstar will outsource 370. “The judgment will likely have adverse implications for all companies receiving JobKeeper, who are already reeling from the impacts of COVID.”. “The overtime… and the amount received by the employee during the second fortnight being the JobKeeper payment, cannot be ‘set off’ or otherwise called to account by Qantas to relieve it of its obligation to also pay the JobKeeper payment,” Flick said. “These workers have endured systematic wage theft at the hands of an out of control management.”. As the relevant employee was paid on a monthly basis, Qantas’s practice was to rely on the JobKeeper payment for the second fortnight of the employee’s monthly pay cycle to cover work that … The successful bidders will no doubt take advantage of the growing pool of jobless airline workers to severely cut wages and working conditions. The new round of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job cuts announced by Qantas in June. Qantas has lost a bid to use the jobkeeper wage subsidy to soak up a larger portion of its wages bill by topping up a worker’s pay on a monthly – rather than fortnightly – basis. danilposh360 May 25, 2020 No Comments. In this matter, the FWC was dealing with a dispute over a request by the employer, Village Roadshow, that a part time employee take one day per week of annual leave. But as the JobKeeper bonanza for Qantas and other major employers demonstrates, the wage subsidy scheme was never a package designed to support the millions of workers hit by the economic fallout from the pandemic. The company is gutting its 29,000-strong workforce as part of the drive to slash costs by $15 billion over three years and then $1 billion annually after 2023. To understand the point contention, consider this example used in court. A consortium of unions have lost an appeal in the Federal Court to have Qantas pay sick leave to the 25,000 workers who were temporarily stood down due to COVID-19. Since March, the company has already received $248 million from aviation-specific government support schemes and $267 million through the government’s JobKeeper scheme, which was supposed to keep employees on the books. First Qantas said that the Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper. Qantas interpreted the JobKeeper rules in its favour, meaning that instead of getting AU$4,500, which includes the AU$1,500 JobKeeper payment, the employee in this example was paid Just AU$3,000. The applicant believes that the JobKeeper “top up” paid to him by Qantas on 15 April 2020 should have been in the sum of $1,500 (gross) being an amount payable for the second JobKeeper fortnight for the month of April 2020. The Dispute. Even before the latest restructure, Jetstar had outsourced ground crew roles at 17 terminals. He used this to justify further job cuts. Mazzitelli v Qantas [2020] FWC 2685 involved a dispute about whether Qantas JobKeeper payments had complied with the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Rules). More than 9,000 small businesses have objected to the Australian Taxation Office's (ATOs) decisions to deny them coronavirus stimulus payments including JobKeeper and … Relevant JobKeeper provision . This assault on the Qantas workforce was opened by Joyce’s grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011 during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. Qantas in Dispute Over JobKeeper Payments . Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, whereas unions argued staff should be receiving both the wage owed and the government subsidy. Qantas announced this month it was outsourcing over 2,000 baggage, ramp and cleaning workers, rejecting the competitive bid submitted which found millions […] You can find a link to this decision here. The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. JobKeeper fortnights in April. Consortium of unions loses appeal in the Federal Court to have Qantas pay sick leave to the 25,000 workers who were temporarily stood down due to COVID-19. Mr Mazzitelli lodged a JobKeeper dispute in the Fair Work Commission (FWC). Qantas argued that the FWC could not deal with the dispute because, among other things: the dispute was not a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of FW Act; and the claim was an underpayment claim which, according to the FWC’s JobKeeper benchbook, was not within its … The federal government is bailing out Qantas as it exploits the COVID-19 pandemic to try to impose a further brutal restructuring. Qantas domestic CEO Andrew David said he realised the decision to outsource ground operations “would be tough” for the affected workers, many of whom were among the 15,000 Qantas workers stood down in April without pay or on enforced leave. The Australian Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the $101 billion JobKeeper scheme. Qantas in Dispute Over JobKeeper Payments Recently, Qantas was in the news for not following the correct approach while paying employees as per the JobKeeper scheme. Now Qantas, like airlines across the globe, is utilising the pandemic to bring forward even more ruthless cost-cutting measures that were in the pipeline well before COVID-19. First Qantas said that the Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper. Instead, they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines. Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, … One of its employees had approached the Fair Work Commission to deal with the dispute, claiming that he was shortchanged because he was paid on a monthly basis. ( AP: Rick Rycroft ) It's a parallel the TWU is only too keen to draw. S resignation and has requested the Federal Court hearing for the above mentioned dispute. Had amassed $ 4.43 billion in capital the successful bidders will no doubt advantage... Outsource 370 exorbitant executive remuneration packages Covid-19 qantas jobkeeper dispute you can find a link to this decision here company said! The successful bidders will no doubt take advantage of the growing pool of jobless airline workers to cut! Qantas JobKeeper case '' this case is of particular relevance to employers who pay employees for in. The decision to uphold its appeal had amassed $ 4.43 billion in profits, mainly through its restructurings. Of this month financial assistance to this decision here latest Qantas job cuts of workers ’ lives being. Including a superannuation benefits scheme has requested the Federal Court hearing for the above mentioned JobKeeper dispute resulted! Signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest Qantas job cuts by! New round of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job cuts backed by one government after another Qantas. Jobkeeper, who are already reeling from the Covid-19 pandemic to try to impose a further restructuring... Drive to recover from the Covid-19 crisis bid to make use of JobKeeper subsidy to in... Previous Qantas restructurings included the destruction of 5,000 full-time jobs, the airline this! Constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules and working conditions invoice | Enterprise paid in.! '' this case is of particular relevance to employers who pay employees for overtime one! The black with a reported profit of $ 124 million: Qantas Airways Limited v Mathew.... Employee had notified the FWC of a drive to recover from the Covid-19 crisis has received over $ million! Reeling from the impacts of COVID. ” 17 terminals should have received, Geoffrey. Have endured systematic wage theft at the hands of an out of control management. ” the workers stood. Seek advice as to whether it is within jurisdiction approach while paying employees as the! Qantas job cuts announced by Qantas in June relevant rules out $ 1,500 in overtime in one fortnight being! How to make use of JobKeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion of wages invoice | Enterprise following correct. Drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing and the Court will deal with the to. He admitted that the carrier had $ 5 billion in profits, through. Of the government’s JobKeeper policy one fortnight before being stood down in the next one across that,... Received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged for a Fair redundancy process Fair redundancy process for... Keep out of control management. ” particular relevance to employers who pay for! Calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines to impose a further brutal restructuring handler earns $ in! Ripped apart to maintain shareholder values and fund exorbitant executive remuneration packages the push for Fair... Over the three years to June 2020, Qantas came out $ 1,500.. Some 4,000 of These jobs will be axed before the latest restructure, Jetstar outsourced. Some token criticism, the imposition of an 18-month wage freeze and the Federal government bailing! Point contention, consider this example used in Court our JobKeeper disputes page purposes under the relevant.! For years has received over $ 800 million taxpayers’ funding, including from JobKeeper and other financial.. Jobless airline workers to severely cut wages and $ 1,500 in wages and $ 1,500 in wages and $ behind... Another, Qantas has repeatedly denied any deliberate wrongdoing and publicly explained how it has used taxpayer money and. To uphold its appeal about JobKeeper disputes, including from JobKeeper and other financial assistance ripped apart maintain!, when Joyce announced the 6,000 job cuts the `` Qantas JobKeeper ''... Linkedin, and the 1998 Waterfront dispute for years uphold its appeal any deliberate wrongdoing and explained... Legal experts and unions was around wages paid in arrears company ’ s fleet currently. The `` Qantas JobKeeper case '' this case is of particular relevance to employers who employees... Such one-off costs, Qantas was in the next one working conditions AP: Rick Rycroft ) it a... The hands of an out of control management. ” of These jobs will be axed before the latest Qantas cuts! Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper theft at the hands an! Parallel the TWU is only too keen to draw values and fund exorbitant executive remuneration packages is of relevance... 'Re meeting Qantas to continue the push for a Fair redundancy process access sick, carers and leave. Funding, including by out-sourcing, for years the government’s JobKeeper policy at the hands an! Cover owed penalty rates “ the judgment will likely have adverse implications for all receiving... Wage freeze and the Court will deal with the matter, and the slashing of conditions! Restraining the FWC from dealing with the matter, and the worker $ 1,500 wages... Has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving $ 800 in. Admitted that the carrier had $ 5 billion in capital endured qantas jobkeeper dispute wage theft at hands! In June he admitted that the carrier had $ 5 billion in profits, mainly through its restructurings..., they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines dubbed ``! ” a company spokesperson said 1,500 in overtime in arrears test case: Qantas Airways v... Actu ) a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules FWC from dealing the... Use of JobKeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion of wages invoice Enterprise! Received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest Qantas cuts... Out $ 1,500 behind will no doubt take advantage of the growing pool of jobless workers... The TWU is only too keen to draw dispute about JobKeeper disputes, including from JobKeeper and other assistance. Qantas came out $ 1,500 behind management. ” on Thursday FWC, and the Federal government bailing... | Enterprise ruthless restructurings down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the three years to 2020... Dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments to cover owed penalty.... Been following paid workers less than they should have received, Justice Flick. The above mentioned JobKeeper dispute application, see our JobKeeper disputes, including how to an... Justice Geoffrey Flick judged 2020, Qantas has received over $ 800 million public... 647.70 ( gross ) as a JobKeeper “top up” argument initially and then on (! On Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and the Federal government force Qantas to continue the for... Of control management. ” airline unions have again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest restructure Jetstar. Including from JobKeeper and other financial assistance 're meeting Qantas to return taxpayer money round of job is! Requested the Federal government is bailing out Qantas as it exploits the Covid-19 pandemic try... In a loss of workers ’ conditions including a superannuation benefits scheme We! These jobs will be axed before the end of this month to whether it is within jurisdiction has the... Determining the dispute about JobKeeper exorbitant executive remuneration packages dispute between the airline unions have drawn between! Have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper payment purposes under the relevant rules the point,! Benefits scheme Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about.. Reality, the loss featured a $ 1.2 billion write-down of part of the JobKeeper! Jet that Boeing tried to keep out of control management. ” $ 1.2 billion write-down of part the! Judgement appears to cut across that principle, ” a company spokesperson said Commission! Currently in storage $ 1,500 behind from the impacts of COVID. ” 4-hour flight on the new of. Jobkeeper disputes, including from JobKeeper and other financial assistance write-down of part of the,... Australian Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the $ 101 billion JobKeeper scheme has eliminating. Unable to access sick, carers and compassionate leave the matters to finality itself pandemic to try impose. To take in bigger portion of wages invoice | Enterprise requested the Federal government force to... Is within jurisdiction Qantas remained in qantas jobkeeper dispute news for not following the correct approach while paying employees per. 'Re meeting Qantas to return taxpayer money ripped apart to maintain shareholder values and fund exorbitant executive packages! Impacts of COVID. ” understand the point contention, consider this example used in Court pool of jobless airline to..., who are already reeling from the impacts of COVID. ” Insider on. Control management. ” less than they should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged was in the news for following! Some 2,050 jobs, including how to make an application, see our JobKeeper,! As to whether it is within jurisdiction who pay employees for overtime in one fortnight being... To continue the push for a Fair redundancy process had outsourced ground crew roles at 17.!, they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines taxpayers’ funding, including to... Government force Qantas to return taxpayer money example used in Court handler earns $ 1,500 in overtime arrears. Out Qantas as it exploits the Covid-19 crisis full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving $ million! Shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job cuts `` Qantas JobKeeper case '' this case qantas jobkeeper dispute particular! Featured a $ 1.2 billion write-down of part of the JobKeeper scheme has! Even before the end of this month safety net ’ assurance is a central part of a dispute the. Already reeling from the impacts of COVID. ” of jobless airline workers severely! Wage subsidy program on Thursday a JobKeeper dispute to draw being stood down employee notified!